Warking on Coding

An examination of the codes of McKenzie Wark

Wark's Web of Signifiers

Posted by Ian Slater On 5:46 PM Categories:

"...our main news feed comes from few hands indeed."

Posted by Ian Slater On 5:48 PM Categories:

★Back to the idea of evil corporate leaders controlling our media intake: these "few hands" signify a very controlling power that manufactures weird global media events. SYM: leaders as hands that feed us news. ★★Why a "news feed?" Are we "fed" news? Certainly, this is a clear connotation: news as good. The subject eats up the event, fueling the weird global media event even more. It is almost as if the subject needs these weird global media events as sustenance.★★★News feeds connote other notions too. A news feed nowadays can take various forms. It comes on the bottom of CNN, it is on our Google sidebar, and it is on Facebook. All of these news feeds are not bringing us the same news. We are saturated by different types of news (Social news on Facebook, worldly news on CNN, local news on our televisions).

"No matter how many channels we get..."

Posted by Ian Slater On 5:41 PM Categories:

★REF: modern-day technology and news. "How many channels" brings about the thought of digital television, DirecTV, Comcast Digital Cable, and so on. We now have upwards of thousands of channels. SYM: channels as modern technology.★★ This also symbolizes a break in traditional news media. We have seemingly endless channels, but Wark phrases this as though we will only get more. Indeed, after he writes his essay, we definitely get more channels. However, these new channels may not always come in the form of a television news channel. Nowadays, they take the form of other media. Mostly, we see new websites coming about as new channels. Googling a hot news story will lead you to countless news websites. If one was to Google "health care reform" under the News section, one is overwhelmed with over 41,000 results. This is definitely a representation of the expansion of news channels in our society. SYM: futuristic channels as internet.

★The connotation of evil militaristic motives expands here."Corporate owners" signifies a certain malice: big wigs looking simply for their own well-being. What comes to mind when discussing big corporate leaders? Bernie Madoff, Enron, and Lehman Brothers to name a few. Essentially, greed. SYM: Corporate leader as greed.

"...become increasingly concentrated in fewer and fewer corporate hands"

Posted by Ian Slater On 5:38 PM Categories:

★ "Never bite the hand that feeds you" is a common cultural phrase. Is a news feed the same? Should we never bite the hand that feeds us the news? Certainly, weird media events come from the news that feeds us. This phrase, used by Wark, connotes a certain power and control, furthering his militaristic and controlling symbolic code. CUL: never bite the hand that feeds you your news. EXPAND

★We get our information from a vector. "Vector" signifies a plethora of different meanings. A military vector, perhaps. The vector for a missile. Indeed, missiles use vectors to seek and destroy their target. Does media similarly maliciously seek out its target in the same manner? Yes, it does. It is a calculated package of news that reaches us through the television, internet, or radio. Take as an example September 11th. This is a certified weird global media event. Would it have been such an event if the media had not calculably delivered us, the subject, repetitive images and descriptions of the hijacking of four planes and the use of them as missiles? To an extent, it would have caused mass hysteria no matter how much the media played a part. However, the use of these media vectors to send the information directly to us through media hubs helps to magnify the frightening aspects of the event and create the weird global media event. The use of the word vector connotes this notion of control and militaristic notions. SYM: Vector as militaristic, powerful, and control-seeking. The media event seeks to capture the subject, to keep them watching. Quite militaristic, indeed.

"Robert McChesney..."

Posted by Ian Slater On 5:32 PM Categories:

HER: Who? Who is Robert McChesney? Why would anyone care what he says? We are given no clarification and no reference as to who this man is other than a footnote. However, we have learned through repetition to trust the theoretical text: if it quotes an outside source, they are most likely a credible and intelligent contribution.